QNSI

Water & wastewater | Modelled case study

Establish a cryptographic baseline for a water SCADA network

Where does cryptography protect control, telemetry, engineering, and business interfaces-and where is it absent?

Accountable ownersUtility Manager · SCADA Engineering · Cybersecurity
Scenario typeComposite model
Required outputDecision artifact

The modelled organisation

A recognisable problem reaches the operating agenda

This composite scenario follows the Utility Manager · SCADA Engineering · Cybersecurity functions. It is grounded in the cited problem context but does not identify a real customer.

Operating environment

A water utility operates treatment plants, pumping stations, reservoirs, remote PLC gateways, engineering workstations, telemetry, and vendor maintenance links.

What is at stake

Control and recovery must remain available during facility loss, communications degradation, or supplier intervention without leaving permanent shared access behind.

Situation

Small teams inherit vendor appliances, radio links, remote sites, and unmanaged certificates without a consolidated technical baseline.

Event that forces action

EPA cybersecurity assessment, treatment-plant modernization, or insurer requirement.

Concrete system boundary

Systems this case study puts in scope

The model is specific about the operational surfaces that must be discovered, changed, or independently checked.

01

SCADA servers

02

engineering workstations

03

remote PLC gateways

04

telemetry and business network interfaces

Modelled case study walkthrough

How this organisation would use QNSI

The walkthrough connects the real-world problem to a bounded QNSI contribution and an independently reviewable result.

01

Recognise the operating condition

Small teams inherit vendor appliances, radio links, remote sites, and unmanaged certificates without a consolidated technical baseline.

02

Frame the decision the owners must make

Where does cryptography protect control, telemetry, engineering, and business interfaces-and where is it absent?

03

Apply QNSI to the controlled boundary

Capture protocols, certificates, keys, algorithms, locations, vendors, owners, and confidence levels in QNSI inventory.

04

Leave the team with a concrete result

A water-system crypto baseline showing protected paths, plaintext exposure, unsupported assets, and practical first actions.

05

Prove the result in the organisation's environment

The utility confirms field observations, process-safety effects, vendor support, budgets, and risk-treatment priorities.

What useful success looks like

A decision artifact plus proof from the real environment

The model stops at a target result. It becomes an actual case study only when a customer produces and independently validates this evidence in production.

Decision artifact

A water-system crypto baseline showing protected paths, plaintext exposure, unsupported assets, and practical first actions.

Independent validation boundary

The utility confirms field observations, process-safety effects, vendor support, budgets, and risk-treatment priorities.

Real-world problem grounding

Primary sources behind the model

These sources establish the external requirement, failure mode, or risk context used to model this case. They do not endorse HEOSSI or prove that QNSI completed the scenario.

Customer evidence status

This is modelled, not a customer claim

The organisation is a composite and the result is a target state. This page does not prove a deployment, customer outcome, certification, legal conclusion, regulator endorsement, or completed control.

QNSI privacy choices

Necessary storage keeps the site secure. With your permission, privacy-bounded analytics help HEOSSI understand pages, journeys, and campaign outcomes. No advertising profiles are created.

Cookie policy