Security
Security at QNSI
QNSI Cloud ships into regulated, mission-critical environments where 'trust us' is not an option. This page states what we operate, what we can prove today, and where a claim is not yet independently verified. Every figure below is derived from the same single-source facts the policy engine, ACVP evidence and service registry use.
QNSI Cloud is a managed platform: we secure the underlying infrastructure and platform services; you control your tenant configuration, user access, and how you use the platform to process data. Where evidence does not yet support a universal claim, we label it NOT VERIFIED rather than imply more than we can prove.
At a glance
Security posture in numbers
Charts state their scope; they do not replace the linked evidence. An available observation does not prove an auditor has accepted the control.
- 435/435ACVP vectors (noble)liboqs 240/240
- 1 / 3 / 5 / 5NIST security floorsdefault · strict · maximum · government
- 4Crypto-policy tiersone shared definition
- 3Compliance frameworks17 mapped controls
- 8HSM connectorsPKCS#11 and REST custody paths
- 18Manifest-declared servicessource inventory, not runtime proof
Evidence
Evidence for QNSI security claims
This section indexes the public artifacts supporting named claims, and states the scope each artifact does and does not establish.
Controls
How QNSI protects your data
The operational controls behind the platform, grouped by domain. Each bullet states the capability and, where applicable, the current evidence boundary.
Encryption & key management
- In transit
- Public edge transport uses the protocol actually negotiated with each client. End-to-end PQC-native transport across every production path is NOT VERIFIED by the currently published evidence. Hybrid compatibility is not represented as pure PQC.
- At rest
- QNSI provides SSE-X and PQC envelope capabilities. Fleet-wide enforcement of ML-KEM wrapping for every stored customer object is NOT VERIFIED by the currently published evidence.
- HSM custody
- Capability-gated PKCS#11 connectors allow root-key custody only after the selected device and configuration pass live qualification.
- Key boundaries
- Key management and cryptographic operations run in dedicated platform components. Vault and KMS keys are never sent to untrusted clients.
Exact security and certification level (FIPS 140-3, etc.) depends on deployment model and HSM configuration.
Access controls
- Tenant isolation
- Tenant-scoped identity and policy enforcement by design. Universal enforcement across every path requires deployment-specific verification.
- Authentication
- Password with optional MFA, physical U2F / FIDO2 keys, SAML SSO (Azure AD, Okta and others) and OIDC.
- Authorization
- Role-based access control (RBAC) plus attribute-based policies (ABAC), least privilege enforced.
- Audit logging
- Security and cryptographic events are recorded to the audit plane. Complete coverage of every operation is NOT VERIFIED by public evidence.
QNSI operates an internal least-privilege IAM model. Access to AWS backend resources and data is controlled via IAM roles and audit logging.
Data handling & retention
- Storage
- Customer content you upload (secrets, keys, files) is stored encrypted within our hosted AWS environment. We do not access customer data except for support with your permission or legal compliance.
- Retention
- Configurable retention periods for audit logs, from 90 days to 7 years.
- Deletion
- On-demand and scheduled deletion for vault secrets and storage files.
- Termination
- On service termination or downgrade, customer data is retained for 30 days before permanent deletion.
Operations
Incident response
QNSI operates an incident response process covering triage, investigation, remediation and recovery. For critical incidents affecting hosted production, customer notification is provided based on severity and impact.
Security breach or unauthorized access
Data loss or corruption
Service outage or degradation
Cryptographic downgrade or policy violation
Report a security incident or question to qnsi-security [at] heossi.com.
Compliance
Compliance & certifications
QNSI is designed to support compliance with major regulatory frameworks. Actual compliance status depends on deployment model and customer configuration. We label each posture honestly.
NIST PQC standards
Evidence publishedAlgorithm-level evidence for ML-KEM (FIPS 203), ML-DSA (FIPS 204) and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205). This is not a FIPS 140-3 module certificate.
FIPS 140-3
Deployment-scopedVendor-certificate scope evaluated during customer HSM qualification.
CSA STAR
Not verifiedRegistry alignment under the QNSI and HEOSSI names is NOT VERIFIED. A self-assessment is not an independent certification.
SOC 2
Not verifiedNo independent examination report is currently published. SOC 2 assurance is NOT VERIFIED.
For compliance questions or audit requests, contact qnsi-compliance [at] heossi.com. Detailed legal terms are in the Terms of Use.
Disclosure
Vulnerability disclosure & advisories
How QNSI receives, remediates, and publishes security issues. Report findings under the terms in our security policy; good-faith research is covered by safe harbour.
How to report
Report privately via security.txt or qnsi-security [at] heossi.com. Stay within scope, avoid accessing other parties' data, and give us reasonable time to remediate before public discussion.
How we remediate
Target acknowledgment within 48 hours and initial assessment within 5 business days. Issues in QNSI Cloud, our hosted service, are fixed server-side with no action required from you. We confirm resolution on the live service before closing a report.
Advisories & CVEs
Hosted-service fixes are tracked with HEOSSI advisory identifiers (HEOSSI-YYYY-NNN) and credited below. We request CVE identifiers for issues in distributed artifacts that customers run themselves, such as the QNSI SDKs, the MCP package, the editor extension, and self-hosted deployments, where a downstream operator needs to upgrade.
Disclosure
Security researcher acknowledgments
We thank the researchers who report issues responsibly under our vulnerability disclosure policy. Good-faith research that follows the safe-harbour terms in our security policy helps keep QNSI customers safe, and we credit it here with the reporter's consent.
kta1kri
November 2026Responsibly disclosed a broken-access-control issue affecting read access on a gateway API surface. Reported within our disclosure policy; remediated by HEOSSI.
HEOSSI-2026-001Mamun Khanka
September 2026Responsibly disclosed a weakness in the OAuth dynamic client registration flow. Reported within our disclosure policy; remediated by HEOSSI.
HEOSSI-2026-002To report a vulnerability, see our security.txt or contact qnsi-security [at] heossi.com.
Questions about QNSI security controls or compliance posture?
Contact Us