Knowledge base
Reports, whitepapers, datasheets, guides - every entry is a real artifact.
No academic primers. No filler. Every link below points at an artifact already published on qnsi.heossi.com - suitable for forwarding to your board or your auditor.
Featured evidence
The three artifacts most often requested in vendor reviews
If you only have ten minutes, start here. Each is independently verifiable.
NIST ACVP Conformance Evidence
435/435 test vectors passed across ML-KEM keyGen + encapsulation, ML-DSA keyGen, and SLH-DSA keyGen. Dual-provider (noble 0.6.1 + liboqs 0.15.1). SHA-3-256 tamper-bound digest. Regenerated per release.
QNSI PQC Performance Benchmarks
Reproducible per-algorithm latency + throughput across ML-KEM, ML-DSA, FN-DSA, SLH-DSA. p50 / p95 / p99 timing, cold-start vs warm-start, multi-process concurrency scaling, native vs pure-JS comparison. Published as schema.org Dataset.
Compliance Mapping - 7 frameworks, 48 controls
Live-evaluated control mapping across SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, PDPA (Singapore), MAS TRM. Each control linked to the QNSI service that evidences it. Per-tier activation.
3 reports
Reports
Tamper-bound evidence files. Each is regenerated per release, SHA-3-256 bound, and downloadable as raw JSON for ingestion into your compliance pipeline.
NIST ACVP Conformance Evidence
435/435 test vectors passed across ML-KEM keyGen + encapsulation, ML-DSA keyGen, and SLH-DSA keyGen. Dual-provider (noble 0.6.1 + liboqs 0.15.1). SHA-3-256 tamper-bound digest. Regenerated per release.
QNSI PQC Performance Benchmarks
Reproducible per-algorithm latency + throughput across ML-KEM, ML-DSA, FN-DSA, SLH-DSA. p50 / p95 / p99 timing, cold-start vs warm-start, multi-process concurrency scaling, native vs pure-JS comparison. Published as schema.org Dataset.
ACVP Evidence (raw JSON)
Tamper-bound machine-readable evidence file. Suitable for ingestion into customer compliance pipelines. Includes per-algorithm pass/fail, run timestamp, dual-provider versions, and SHA-3-256 of the full payload.
2 whitepapers
Whitepapers
Architecture-grade documentation of how QNSI composes cryptographic primitives. Citation-dense - NIST, IETF, vendor FIPS records.
QNSI Entropy Chain
End-to-end documentation of QNSI's three-chain entropy architecture (CSPRNG, HSM DRBG, optional QRNG mix-in). Cites NIST SP 800-90A / 90B / 90C, Linux getrandom, Intel RDRAND/RDSEED, AWS Nitro DRBG, and per-vendor HSM FIPS 140-3 records.
Security Hub - Verifiable Evidence Index
Index of every verifiable trust artifact QNSI publishes. Each entry is downloadable, dated, and reproducibly bound to a build SHA. Designed for use in regulator review and audit packs.
18 articles
Articles
Practical writing on PQC migration, vendor evaluation, compliance, and the platform engineering behind QNSI.
IBM Defined Application-Level Crypto-Agility. QNSI Takes It Into Enterprise Execution
IBM Research has given crypto-agility a rigorous application-level model. We mapped it against QNSI's shipped code: strong overlap, a broader enterprise execution layer - and two gaps our forensic review found and then closed.
Native PQC HSMs Are Here: How QNSI Solves the Real Migration Problem
Native PQC and HSPK evidence boundaries; live multi-tenant production operation is NOT VERIFIED.
Post-Quantum Claims Should Be Verifiable: How QNSI Proves Them
Security teams cannot migrate regulated estates on adjectives. See how QNSI connects discovery, governed change, qualified custody, reproducible conformance evidence, and dual-signed product facts.
Migrating a Bank's Cryptography to Quantum-Safe via QNSI: A 2026 Field Guide
A source-mapped bank migration reference; end-to-end production execution is NOT VERIFIED.
Five PQC Vendor Evaluation Questions - and QNSI's Evidence Boundaries
Separate PQC evidence from marketing; QNSI production execution beyond published artifact scope is NOT VERIFIED.
'Harvest Now, Decrypt Later' Is on a 2027 Clock - Here's How to Beat It with QNSI
An HNDL migration planning framework; QNSI production execution is NOT VERIFIED.
MAS TRM and PQC: How Singapore Financial Institutions Comply with QNSI
A MAS TRM source mapping, not production control proof; runtime effectiveness is NOT VERIFIED.
What ML-KEM Does - and How QNSI Runs It for You Today
ML-KEM concepts and QNSI architecture boundaries; end-to-end production execution is NOT VERIFIED.
Continuous Compliance vs. Snapshot Reports: QNSI Source Contracts and Evidence Boundaries
Continuous-compliance architecture and evidence boundaries; QNSI production effectiveness is NOT VERIFIED.
Is AES Quantum-Safe? What to Keep, What to Replace, and QNSI's Required Design
Keep AES-256 only after genuine PQC establishment; QNSI end-to-end production execution is NOT VERIFIED.
ML-DSA on QNSI: Signature Contracts and Evidence Boundaries
ML-DSA concepts and source contracts; QNSI production signing behavior is NOT VERIFIED.
Crypto-Agility Is an Operating Capability: How QNSI Connects Policy, Inventory, and Migration
When an algorithm falls, policy alone is not enough. QNSI connects per-tenant controls over 87 algorithms with CBOM inventory, governed migration, approvals, and signed evidence.
How to Choose a Post-Quantum Cryptography Platform in 2026 | QNSI
Eight criteria decide any PQC platform purchase. This guide states each one, gives QNSI's answer, and shows how to verify it yourself - live ACVP evidence, 87 algorithms, governed crypto policy, and a Free Forever tier to test today.
SLH-DSA on QNSI: Hash-Based Signatures for Your Most Conservative Signing Paths
Keys you can never re-key deserve the most conservative signature NIST finalized. Deploy SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) on QNSI with one API call, or enforce it as per-tenant policy - and verify our live ACVP evidence before you trust it.
The Quantum Timeline Doesn't Matter - Your Data's Lifetime Does. Start on QNSI Today
Use data lifetime and migration time to plan; QNSI deployment timelines and execution are NOT VERIFIED.
Composite Interoperability Without Guesswork: X25519 + ML-KEM on QNSI
PQC-native is primary; X25519MLKEM768 is explicit composite-interop, and production negotiation is NOT VERIFIED.
CNSA 2.0 Compliance on QNSI: ML-KEM-1024 and ML-DSA-87 as a Policy Setting
A CNSA 2.0 source-contract mapping; deployment-wide QNSI enforcement is NOT VERIFIED.
Beyond AWS KMS: Migrating to Post-Quantum Key Management with QNSI
A reversible AWS KMS migration reference; QNSI end-to-end production execution is NOT VERIFIED.
16 datasheets
Datasheets
Per-product and per-algorithm reference. Every datasheet maps to a real backend service running on the QNSI platform today.
QNSI Platform Architecture
18 production services across identity, decision, enforcement, data, operations, control, evidence, edge, and provisioning boundaries. Manifest-driven routes and 4 crypto-policy enforcement tiers.
Capabilities
Maturity ladder (Discover → Enforce → Scale), named-service tiles (KMS, Vault, CBOM, Edge-Gateway, Audit, Enclaves), and the CISO pain-set this platform addresses.
Compliance Mapping - 7 frameworks, 48 controls
Live-evaluated control mapping across SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, PDPA (Singapore), MAS TRM. Each control linked to the QNSI service that evidences it. Per-tier activation.
ML-KEM - Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism
NIST's primary post-quantum key encapsulation standard, finalised August 2024 as FIPS 203. QNSI policy sources select ML-KEM across PQC-native tiers and define it for transport and envelope targets; complete production negotiation and envelope execution remain NOT VERIFIED.
ML-DSA - Module-Lattice-based Digital Signature Algorithm
NIST's primary post-quantum digital signature standard, finalised August 2024 as FIPS 204. ML-DSA powers JWT signing, audit-log integrity, code-signing, and authn token issuance across QNSI.
SLH-DSA - Stateless Hash-based Digital Signature Algorithm
NIST's hash-based digital signature standard, finalised August 2024 as FIPS 205. SLH-DSA's security rests only on the hardness of finding hash function preimages - the most conservative assumption available - making it the natural choice for long-archival signatures and government-tier policy.
FN-DSA - FFT-based NTRU Digital Signature Algorithm
NIST's fourth standardised PQC signature scheme, formally FN-DSA under FIPS 206 - the initial public draft is still pending as of mid-2026. Falcon's signatures are the most compact of the lattice-based PQC schemes, making it preferred for size-constrained transport.
BIKE - Bit Flipping Key Encapsulation
Code-based KEM finalist (round 4 of NIST PQC standardisation) using QC-MDPC codes. Available in liboqs for QNSI customers seeking additional code-based alternatives.
Classic McEliece - Classic McEliece Code-Based KEM
The original code-based public-key cryptosystem, in continuous study since 1978 - by far the oldest cryptographic assumption in the PQC catalogue. Trades extremely large public keys for the most-studied security assumption available.
FrodoKEM - Frodo Key Encapsulation Mechanism
Plain Learning With Errors (LWE) KEM - same lattice family as ML-KEM but without the additional ring or module structure. Larger keys and ciphertexts but built on the most conservative lattice assumption.
NTRU - Number Theoretic Research Unit Cryptosystem
One of the oldest lattice-based KEMs, in continuous study since 1996. NTRU was a NIST PQC finalist but not selected for FIPS standardisation in favour of ML-KEM.
NTRU Prime - NTRU Prime (Streamlined / Light NTRU Prime)
NTRU variant designed to use a prime-degree ring polynomial, removing certain structural concerns. Notably deployed in OpenSSH's default post-quantum key exchange.
MAYO - Multivariate Quadratic Signatures (MAYO)
Multivariate quadratic signature scheme in the NIST PQC additional-signatures track. Short signatures and small public keys; trades signing speed against parameter size.
CROSS - Codes and Restricted Objects Signature Scheme
Code-based signature using the MPC-in-the-head paradigm over restricted syndrome decoding. NIST PQC additional-signatures track candidate.
UOV - Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar Signatures
Multivariate signature scheme based on the Unbalanced Oil and Vinegar (UOV) construction, one of the longest-studied multivariate schemes.
SNOVA - Simple Noncommutative-ring-based UOV Algorithm
Multivariate signature scheme using a non-commutative ring structure to reduce public-key size relative to plain UOV. NIST PQC additional-signatures track candidate.
4 guides
Guides
Buyer-side migration paths, vendor evaluation rubrics, and the operating model for moving production trust onto QNSI.
PQC Migration Guide
Five-stage migration path: inventory → parallel-deploy → cross-verify → automate → evidence. Concrete actions, tooling, and timeline for each stage.
The Quantum Imperative
HNDL exposure model, NIST PQC standards timeline, CNSA 2.0 mandate dates, the migration window. The case for moving now, not in 2030.
Why QNSI
Algorithm breadth, dual-provider verification, 4 policy tiers, audit chain, and 8 capability-gated HSM connector implementations - the buyer-evaluation rubric.
Vet PQC Vendors - Five Red Flags
Five patterns of PQC theatre to catch in a 10-minute call: 'quantum-ready' without algorithm specifics, single-implementation lock-in, missing FIPS evidence, no algorithm-agility story, no audit chain.
6 comparisons
Comparisons
Side-by-side QNSI vs the platforms enterprise teams already use - AWS KMS, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, Fortanix DSM, SandboxAQ.
QNSI vs AWS KMS
Side-by-side comparison: PQC algorithm coverage, FIPS validation, multi-cloud crypto posture, dual-provider cross-verification, crypto-policy enforcement, APAC regulatory home, and pricing transparency.
QNSI vs Azure Key Vault
Side-by-side comparison: PQC algorithm coverage, FIPS validation, multi-cloud crypto posture, dual-provider cross-verification, crypto-policy enforcement, APAC regulatory home, and pricing transparency.
QNSI vs HashiCorp Vault
Side-by-side comparison: PQC algorithm coverage, FIPS validation, multi-cloud crypto posture, dual-provider cross-verification, crypto-policy enforcement, APAC regulatory home, and pricing transparency.
QNSI vs Fortanix DSM
Side-by-side comparison: PQC algorithm coverage, FIPS validation, multi-cloud crypto posture, dual-provider cross-verification, crypto-policy enforcement, APAC regulatory home, and pricing transparency.
QNSI vs SandboxAQ
Side-by-side comparison: PQC algorithm coverage, FIPS validation, multi-cloud crypto posture, dual-provider cross-verification, crypto-policy enforcement, APAC regulatory home, and pricing transparency.
Competitive Analysis
Side-by-side QNSI vs cloud KMS, dedicated HSM platforms, and specialist PQC vendors. Algorithm coverage, FIPS posture, multi-cloud, sovereignty, pricing transparency.
3 faqs
FAQ
Concrete answers - no marketing fluff - to the questions every prospective customer asks.
FAQ - Getting Started
What is QNSI, how the free tier works, what happens when you exceed limits, how upgrades and downgrades work.
FAQ - Technical
Algorithms supported, hardware enclaves, HSM integration. Concrete technical answers without marketing fluff.
FAQ - Compliance
FIPS 140-3 posture, compliance frameworks, data residency, where customer data lives.
35 terms
PQC glossary
Buyer-grade definitions. Every entry cites a NIST publication, FIPS standard, IETF RFC, or QNSI source-of-truth file.
Algorithms (9)
ML-KEM · Kyber · CRYSTALS-Kyber
Module-Lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism. NIST's primary post-quantum KEM standard, finalised as FIPS 203 in August 2024. Three parameter sets (512, 768, 1024) at NIST security levels 1, 3, and 5. QNSI default KEM in every tier.
FIPS 203 →ML-DSA · Dilithium · CRYSTALS-Dilithium
Module-Lattice-based Digital Signature Algorithm. NIST's primary post-quantum signature standard, finalised as FIPS 204 in August 2024. Three parameter sets (44, 65, 87). Used by QNSI for JWT signing, audit-chain Merkle-root sealing, and CBOM attestation.
FIPS 204 →SLH-DSA · SPHINCS+
Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm. NIST's hash-based signature standard, finalised as FIPS 205 in August 2024. Twelve parameter sets across SHA2 / SHAKE hash families. Conservative security based solely on hash-function strength - used by QNSI on Government tier when lattice assumptions are not acceptable.
FIPS 205 →FN-DSA · Falcon
FFT-over-NTRU-Lattices Digital Signature Algorithm. NIST signature standard scheduled as FIPS 206 (draft). Two parameter sets (512, 1024). Smaller signatures than ML-DSA, used by QNSI for code-signing and TLS certificates where on-wire size matters.
HQC
Hamming Quasi-Cyclic. NIST-selected code-based KEM (March 2025). Three parameter sets (128, 192, 256). Not currently offered by QNSI: liboqs disables HQC by default pending its corrected 2025-spec implementation (an unresolved design flaw, CVE-2025-48946), so QNSI ships code-based backups via Classic McEliece and BIKE instead.
NIST IR 8528 →Classic McEliece
Code-based KEM from a 1978 cryptosystem with the longest cryptanalytic track record of any NIST candidate. Very large public keys (~261 KB at level 5) but very small ciphertexts (~96 bytes). NIST Round 4 finalist; QNSI supports it for HNDL-conservative deployments.
BIKE
Bit Flipping Key Encapsulation. NIST Round 4 KEM finalist, code-based, balanced key-size vs ciphertext-size. Three parameter sets (L1, L3, L5).
FrodoKEM
Plain Learning-with-Errors KEM without the algebraic structure of ML-KEM. Larger but conservative - selected by BSI (German government) for high-assurance applications.
MAYO
Multivariate signature scheme from NIST's onramp signature competition. Smaller signatures than ML-DSA, larger public keys.
PQC concepts (9)
PQC · Post-Quantum Cryptography
Cryptography designed to resist attack by both classical and quantum computers. Distinct from quantum cryptography (which uses quantum mechanics to transmit keys, e.g. QKD). All four NIST standards (FIPS 203/204/205/206) are PQC - they run on classical hardware and resist quantum attack.
CRQC · Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer
A quantum computer capable of breaking RSA-2048 or equivalent classical cryptography. No authoritative arrival date exists. NIST transition guidance removes quantum-vulnerable algorithms by 2035, with high-risk systems moving earlier.
HNDL · Harvest Now, Decrypt Later
Adversary captures encrypted traffic today and stores it. When a CRQC arrives, every captured ciphertext is retroactively decryptable. Long-life records (medical, financial, classified, transcripts) are HNDL targets the moment they touch a wire.
KEM · Key Encapsulation Mechanism
A primitive that establishes a shared symmetric key between two parties without traditional public-key encryption. ML-KEM, HQC, BIKE, FrodoKEM, McEliece are all KEMs. Used to wrap AES-256-GCM data keys in QNSI vault + KMS.
Hybrid PQC · X25519MLKEM768
Composition of a classical KEM (X25519) and a PQC KEM (ML-KEM-768) where session security holds if either is unbroken. Standard for PQC TLS today - used by QNSI edge-gateway, AWS KMS, Google Cloud KMS, Cloudflare, and the major browsers.
Lattice-based cryptography
Cryptography whose security reduces to the hardness of problems on mathematical lattices (Learning With Errors, Module-LWE, NTRU). ML-KEM, ML-DSA, FN-DSA are all lattice-based. Most widely deployed PQC family in 2026.
Code-based cryptography
Cryptography whose security reduces to decoding random linear codes. McEliece (1978), HQC, BIKE, CROSS. Longest cryptanalytic track record of any PQC family.
Cryptographic agility · Crypto-agility
The architectural property that lets an organisation swap one cryptographic algorithm for another without changing application code or data-at-rest formats. QNSI crypto-policy tiers + KMS algorithm parameter implement this directly - application code calls `kms.encrypt(key)` and the policy decides which algorithm runs.
Cross-verification
Running the same cryptographic operation through two independent implementations and comparing results - defends against implementation bugs (not algorithm weakness). QNSI cross-verifies between liboqs (C/native) and @noble/post-quantum (pure-JS) on Maximum and Government tiers across the 18 algorithms shared by both providers.
Standards & programs (11)
FIPS 203
NIST Federal Information Processing Standard for ML-KEM. Final, published August 2024. Authoritative spec for ML-KEM-512 / 768 / 1024 parameter sets, key generation, encapsulation, and decapsulation procedures.
Read the standard →FIPS 204
NIST Federal Information Processing Standard for ML-DSA. Final, published August 2024. Authoritative spec for ML-DSA-44 / 65 / 87.
Read the standard →FIPS 205
NIST Federal Information Processing Standard for SLH-DSA. Final, published August 2024. Authoritative spec for SLH-DSA across SHA2 and SHAKE hash families.
Read the standard →FIPS 140-3
NIST standard for cryptographic MODULE validation (CMVP). Distinct from FIPS 203/204/205, which standardize ALGORITHMS. 8 connector implementations - 6 via PKCS#11 (AWS CloudHSM · Azure Dedicated HSM · Thales Luna · Entrust nShield · Utimaco CryptoServer · Marvell LiquidSecurity) and 2 via REST API (HashiCorp Vault Transit · Fortanix DSM). The generic PKCS#11 path is verified with SoftHSM, the Vault REST path is verified with a live Vault backend, and QNSI's shipped provider plus HSPK custody path are proven on AWS CloudHSM hsm2m.medium in FIPS mode. Named hardware is enabled only after per-deployment qualification. AWS CloudHSM can provide FIPS 140-3 Level 3 custody under Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.'s certificate #4703 only after the customer provisions and QNSI qualifies that service for the deployment. Native-PQC HSM and cloud-KMS products now exist; their algorithms, firmware, and validation scope vary. QNSI's current HSPK API supports ML-DSA-44/65/87 as a software signing compatibility path rooted in qualified HSM custody, while QNSI's 87-algorithm catalog is a broader software migration and interoperability surface.
CNSA 2.0 · Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0
NSA mandate to transition US National Security Systems to post-quantum algorithms. ML-KEM-1024, ML-DSA-87, SLH-DSA-256 are the CNSA 2.0 algorithm set. Compliance dates: 2030-2033 depending on system class. QNSI Government tier locks exactly to this algorithm set.
NSA CNSA 2.0 advisory →NIST ACVP · Automated Cryptographic Validation Protocol
NIST's automated protocol for testing cryptographic implementations against canonical test vectors. Run as part of the CAVP (Cryptographic Algorithm Validation Program). QNSI runs an ACVP-shaped conformance harness against both providers and publishes results at /verify/conformance with SHA-3-256 tamper-binding.
NIST CAVP →NIST SP 800-208
NIST Special Publication on stateful hash-based signatures (XMSS, LMS) - used for code-signing and firmware. QNSI supports the SLH-DSA family for these workloads.
NIST SP 800-90A/B/C
NIST Special Publications on random bit generation. 800-90A defines DRBG (deterministic generators); 800-90B defines entropy sources; 800-90C composes them into an RBG. QNSI entropy chain is documented at /security/entropy with citations to each.
MAS TRM · Monetary Authority of Singapore - Technology Risk Management
Singapore's regulator-grade IT risk framework for licensed financial institutions. Released January 2021. QNSI evaluates 10 MAS TRM controls live in audit-service. Live evaluation page at /security/compliance.
PDPA · Personal Data Protection Act (Singapore)
Singapore's data protection law (2012, revised 2021). QNSI evaluates 9 PDPA obligations including consent, purpose limitation, protection, retention, and breach notification.
DORA · Digital Operational Resilience Act (EU)
EU regulation covering ICT third-party risk and operational resilience for financial entities. Applies to insurers, asset managers, banks, payment providers. QNSI maps to DORA via its continuous compliance evidence chain.
QNSI platform (6)
CBOM · Cryptographic Bill of Materials
CycloneDX-compatible inventory of every cryptographic asset across an organisation's estate - algorithms, keys, certificates, TLS endpoints, code-signing keys. QNSI crypto-inventory-service exports CBOM with per-asset NIST classification and HNDL-exposure scoring.
BYOH · Bring Your Own HSM
Deployment model in which a capability-qualified customer HSM becomes the root of trust for QNSI KMS. Only after qualification may sign / wrap / unwrap operations be represented as executing inside the customer boundary. 6 connector implementations use PKCS#11 (AWS CloudHSM, Azure Dedicated HSM, Thales Luna, Entrust nShield, Utimaco CryptoServer, Marvell LiquidSecurity) and 2 use REST (HashiCorp Vault Transit, Fortanix DSM).
SSE-X · Searchable Symmetric Encryption with eXtended PQC
QNSI's searchable encryption layer - clients can query encrypted indexes without the server seeing plaintext. PQC-wrapped data keys protect the underlying AES-256-GCM symmetric encryption. Used in vault search, storage search, and encrypted vector search for RAG.
Crypto-policy tier
Per-tenant enforcement level that locks which PQC algorithms and parameter sets are allowed. Four tiers: default (all 87 algorithms), strict (FIPS-finalised KEMs + signatures), maximum (strongest parameter sets, cross-verification mandatory), government (CNSA 2.0 lock + HSM required). Defined in packages/security/src/crypto-policy.ts.
Audit chain
QNSI audit-service source defines hash chaining, SHA3-512 Merkle aggregation, and ML-DSA checkpoint signing. Complete ingestion from every producer, root publication, and reconstruction of each historical operation require deployment evidence and remain NOT VERIFIED until recorded.
Tenant isolation
QNSI source defines per-tenant keys, audit chains, policy, edge authorization, service identity, KMS scoping, and vault scoping. Complete isolation across synchronous, asynchronous, storage, cache, export, log, and support paths requires deployment-specific negative testing.
FAQ
Getting Started
4 concrete answers - no marketing fluff.
What is QNSI?
QNSI (Quantum-Native Security Infrastructure) is a comprehensive security platform implementing NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptography. It provides 18 production microservices including auth, storage, search, KMS, vault, and AI orchestration - all protected with quantum-resistant encryption.
How does the free tier work?
The free tier has no time limit or credit-card requirement and includes published allocations for storage, API calls, KMS keys, vault secrets, and SDK access. Entitlement does not prove every service operation, PQC envelope, or PQC transport path; verify the exact route and evidence required.
What happens when I exceed free tier limits?
When you approach your limits, you'll receive notifications via the cloud portal. You can upgrade to a paid tier anytime. There's no automatic overage billing - your account will be rate-limited until you upgrade or your monthly quota resets.
Can I upgrade or downgrade my plan?
Yes. You can upgrade anytime through the cloud portal with immediate effect. Downgrades take effect at the end of your current billing period. Annual plans offer 5-15% savings.
FAQ
Technical
3 concrete answers - no marketing fluff.
What post-quantum cryptography algorithms does QNSI use?
QNSI implements 87 PQC algorithms across 13 families. NIST-finalized: ML-KEM (FIPS 203), ML-DSA (FIPS 204), and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205). Additional families include BIKE, Classic McEliece, FrodoKEM, NTRU, MAYO, CROSS, UOV, and SNOVA.
What hardware enclaves does QNSI support?
QNSI supports 8 hardware enclave types: Intel SGX, AMD SEV, NVIDIA CC, Intel TDX, ARM TrustZone, ARM CCA/RME, AWS Nitro Enclaves, and IBM Secure Execution. All include cryptographic attestation.
How does QNSI integrate with HSMs?
QNSI provides capability-gated connectors for major PKCS#11 HSMs and REST custody backends. Root keys become hardware-backed only after the customer's exact device, firmware, mode, credentials, mechanisms, and evidence path pass qualification.
FAQ
Compliance
3 concrete answers - no marketing fluff.
Is QNSI FIPS 140-3 certified?
No - QNSI publishes algorithm-level conformance evidence, not a QNSI module-level FIPS 140-3 / CMVP validation. A customer HSM's vendor certificate applies only to the specific validated model, firmware, operating mode, and approved deployment configuration.
What compliance frameworks does QNSI support?
QNSI is designed to support SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and FedRAMP requirements. CSA STAR Level 1 self-assessment is publicly available. Actual compliance status depends on deployment model and customer configuration.
Where is customer data stored?
QNSI Cloud (hosted) runs on AWS ap-southeast-1 (Singapore). Enterprise tiers support region selection, VPC deployment, on-premises, and air-gapped deployments for data residency requirements.
Next