Software & SaaS · Application Security · Platform Engineering · Architecture
Find hidden cryptography in a SaaS dependency graph
Which libraries, runtimes, services, and managed dependencies will block a cryptographic transition?
Operational pain
SBOM package names do not reliably reveal certificates, protocol defaults, bundled providers, transitive crypto libraries, or runtime configuration.
Trigger
PQC roadmap, framework upgrade, merger integration, or a vulnerable cryptographic dependency.
QNSI contribution
Connect the decision to a controlled security path
Combine QNSI cryptographic discovery with software component and runtime ownership records to identify actual use and uncertainty.
Decision artifact
A dependency-level crypto migration backlog with observed use, package origin, upgrade path, and false-positive status.
What still requires validation
Engineering reproduces findings, tests upgraded dependencies, checks licensing, and verifies production negotiation and behavior.
External problem context
Primary sources
These sources establish the external requirement or risk context. They do not endorse HEOSSI or prove that QNSI completed this scenario.
Evidence boundary
What this page does—and does not—prove
This is a product evaluation pattern, not a customer case study, certification, legal opinion, regulator endorsement, or claim that a production deployment completed the described work.